[UPDATED December 18th] Congress passes CISA – under new name of Cybersecurity Act of 2015 – attached to ‘omnibus’ last minute federal budget bill.
[UPDATED October 27th, 2015 ] The US Senate voted in favour of a legislation that might cripple the very idea of online privacy.
Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act( CISA) of 2015 is a modified bill known as CISPA(Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act) which failed to pass congress 3 times due to public criticism.
CISA would allow big corporations to share information about cyber threat with the government or each other without fear of being sued.
The controversial bill that is making it’s way to becoming law in the US has undergone several revisions and has been met with a lot of criticism. Alas, a version of CISA was passed by the House of Representatives in April of this year, then made more headway towards becoming law on October 22, 2015 as the revised bill advanced in US Senate with support from both parties and the White House. If the bill will pass the Senate vote on Tuesday October 27th – the bill would need to be reconciled before it would get signed into law by the President.
[UPDATE] CISA, renamed Cybersecurity Act of 2015, was quietly added to the federal budget bill on Wednesday December 16th, 2015 with many congressmen failing to read the 2000+ page ‘Omnibus’ budget bill before voting on December 18th. The bill was passed 316 to 113. Now, that the bill was passed in the federal budget – the presidents signature officially enacts CISA into law.
According to the supporters of the bill, it is a comprehensive step toward securing private data against hackers achieved by having companies share early “cyberthreat indicators” with the Department of Homeland Security. The opposition – groups advocating internet privacy, security and civil liberties believe the bill will cause more problems than it will solve.
Internet communication companies like Facebook or Google have access to a lot of private internet user data. CISA would grant such companies the right to monitor and take initiative against any perceived ‘suspicious’ threats. This means the personal data of millions of users would be actively monitored and collected. In turn, the companies would gain immunity to any existing surveillance laws.
CNN reports: Two major tech industry groups that together represent Amazon, Dell, eBay, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Yahoo and others stand starkly against the bill for privacy reasons. Apple, Salesforce and Twitter have issued statements saying the bill is a bad idea.
The Silicon Valley Giants argue that CISA does not offer any protection or solutions to the cyber attacks they would need to report on, instead it invades their user privacy.
CISA would require the said companies to disclose that data to the government without a warrant. More precisely – ‘real time’ sharing of information would take place.
Information likely shared: Could be anything from email content, passwords, IP addresses, or personal information associated with an account.
Earlier this year the hacking scandal of OPM was cited when trying convince the politicians and the public that the US needs to prevent foreign threats online. The problem with this logic is that of false attribution. Instead of fortifying security standards like security protocol enhancement and eduction (i.e. alarming number of OPM accounts used the password ‘password’ to access their accounts) -the focus is on a program that would compromise and expose more data as it is shared.
The companies which would track and monitor internet user data, would gain a significant set of powers with little to no oversight. Also they would not be accountable, unless ‘significant’ harm came to innocent bystander.
All information collected with CISA would be warrantless and exempt from detailed reporting on the data collection and subsequent fate once it was passed on to agencies like FBI, NSA, etc.
The definitions on terms like “Cybersecurity threat” or “Cyber threat indicators” are so vague that they impose virtually no limitations on what data can be collected and shared.
Considering just earlier this year the Circuit Court of Appeals voted mass surveillance illegal, it is disappoint to see that the the controversial bill becoming the law.